マツザキ トモアキ   MATSUZAKI TOMOAKI
  松崎 和炯
   所属   関西医科大学  腎泌尿器外科学講座
   職種   助教
論文種別 原著(症例報告除く)
言語種別 英語
査読の有無 査読あり
表題 Complete intraureteral stent placement relieves daytime urinary frequency compared with conventional placement in patients with an indwelling ureteral stent: post-hoc analysis of a randomized, controlled trial
掲載誌名 正式名:Scientific reports
略  称:Sci Rep
ISSNコード:20452322
掲載区分国外
巻・号・頁 10(1),pp.15892
著者・共著者 Matsuzaki T, Yoshida T, Murota T, Nakao K, Taguchi M, Kinoshita H, Matsuda T
担当区分 筆頭著者
発行年月 2020/09
概要 A previous randomized, controlled trial had demonstrated that complete intraureteral stent placement (CIU-SP) was superior to conventional stent placement (C-SP) in terms of improvement of stent-related urinary symptoms. However, it is unclear as to which subdomain symptom and cohort could benefit the most from CIU-SP compared to C-SP in urinary symptoms while considering the baseline urinary status. To determine this, a post-hoc analysis was performed using data from a previous study (CIU-SP group, n = 39; C-SP group, n = 41). We assessed the mean changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) and the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) from baseline to day 14. Statistical comparison between the two groups was performed using analysis of covariance with adjustment of baseline urinary status as a covariate. Among 80 patients, the total I-PSS was significantly lower in the CIU-SP group than in the C-SP group in the cohort with mild urinary symptoms (P = 0.005), but not in those with moderate/severe symptoms (P = 0.521). The CIU-SP group showed significantly improved I-PSS and OABSS daytime frequencies, with the highest t statistic (2.47 and 2.10, respectively) among subdomains of both symptom scores compared with the C-SP group (both P < 0.001). In multivariate regression analysis, the stent placement method (CIU-SP vs. C-SP) was independently associated with the I-PSS daytime frequency on day 14 (P = 0.017). This study suggests that CIU-SP significantly improved stent-related daytime frequency compared with C-SP, and it may benefit especially those patients who have mild urinary symptoms before the placement of ureteral stents.
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-72937-0.
PMID 32985580